Article by Scott Purcell, Dan Urbaniack and Jason Cooper, Division Manager and Practice Managers in Jobspring Silicon Valley
If you were to ask the average American what they picture when they hear Silicon Valley, they’d probably say the big names like Google in Mountain View, Apple in Cupertino, and the Stanford/Palo Alto lifestyle they saw in The Social Network. While these may be the landmarks people outside of California have come to know as the epicenter of technology, Silicon Valley has become a sprawling and growing landscape represented across the bay area. With Google and Apple buying up office space left and right in their respective cities, and companies like Palantir seemingly doing the same in Palo Alto, tech startups are often forced to find other cities to call home.
But let’s say you want to move to the Silicon Valley; where do you start? Which areas were popular in the past and where is it hot spot now? Where will you be most profitable? Where are the startups and the big name companies located? Being in the tech recruiting space, we have all had ample experience in this market. Hopefully, with our knowledge, you’ll be able to find your perfect location to get the most out of Silicon Valley.
Many people consider the Silicon Valley to be the technologically-savvy region ranging from San Mateo, California to San Jose. As Scott stated in a previous post, the area is booming and salaries are higher than ever. However, there is a serious concern throughout the Valley-- where do people live? How does anyone outside of the top dog execs or the plain lucky afford to live a comfortable life when an average one bedroom apartment goes for $2,100 a month? Where do the folks working the lower-salary tech jobs go?
Since the recession in 2010 things have slowly begun to change. A blazing hot startup and IPO market pushed salaries to record level highs, and with that market, housing prices have also risen. It has become incredibly difficult to purchase a home in the region. The local real estate market is selling faster than ever, thus driving rental prices higher and making it difficult for those not making the top bucks to live comfortably within their means.
Surprisingly, Downtown San Jose housing seems to be plateauing at a reasonable price through this real estate resurgence. There are multiple new apartments, offices, and entertainment spaces being built in the area, and there seems to be a lot of room to expand; which begs the question, how will all of this growth affect the cost of living and the economy of the region as a whole?
The Palo Alto area has had the largest growth in the Bay Area between the Summer of 2012 to Summer of 2013; while over the last three years, Santa Clara County has become the second fastest-growing county in California. One of the major reasons for the rapid population growth is the above average regional job growth.
Let’s look at some of the local players within 5 miles of Palo Alto:
- Apple, located in Cupertino: whose stock over the last three years has grown from $422/share to $580/share, while hitting a high of +$700/share during that time period
- Google, Mountain View: 2010 – $610/share, 2013 - $1105/share (high-water mark)
- Tesla, Palo Alto: 2010 - $22/share, 2013 -$150/share, with a high +/- $200/share
- HortonWorks, Palo Alto: Founded in 2011 and still pre-IPO has received almost $100 million in funding.
So why are those numbers so important? They are directly correlated with opportunity. The common dominator for the candidates that we speak to everyday are: stability, cutting-edge technology, and an opportunity for growth. Silicon Valley is the 21st century’s American Dream- the combination of professional growth, premier technology companies, mild winters and gorgeous summers makes the region, and specifically Palo Alto, an ideal place to begin or jump start your career. Not to mention salaries that are reminiscent of the “.Com Era”.
However, this rapid expansion has created a predictable but not-so-easy to solve problem: where can we put everyone? Forget about office space or commercial real estate issues for a minute and let’s just look at living situations. On November 5th, the voters of Palo Alto overturned a council approval for the development of 60 apartments and 12 single-family homes. The approved plan allowed housing developers to exceed zoning regulations for public benefit. The constituents of Palo Alto don’t see it this way. They think the area is overpopulated, extremely dense, and parking is a nightmare. Check out this quote from a commenter on a recent article about Measure D, the aforementioned Palo Alto proposal-
“The damage is done and maneuvering downtown with wall-to-wall people and cars is disgusting. I’m so disappointed in this city and walk around frustrated every day I walk out my front door. I can’t drive down my street to get to my house between 3pm – 6pm, we can’t park in front of our house because all of the downtown employees, I sit in bumper-to-bumper traffic, and riding our bikes through all of this traffic is getting more dangerous…
-Downtown Palo Alto Resident - Link
The Peninsula has become an attractive place to set up shop. Available homes and office spaces in areas like Redwood City, San Mateo, Belmont, and San Bruno are popular choices. The rent in this region of the Bay Area is comparable and cheaper than many of the other surrounding areas. It’s no secret that there is a shortage of qualified engineering talent out there. By living in the Peninsula, more transportation options, including public, becomes a possibility. The location is fairly central to people commuting from all directions. For example, the growing populace of tech work in Redwood City and San Francisco is just a short Cal-Train ride away. Want to go south? Taking the 280 to San Mateo or San Jose is a much more attractive option to avoid the bumper-to-bumper traffic found on one the most highly congested freeways in America.
For many of the same reasons, in addition to the number of bridges, certain cities in the east bay, like Fremont, are also becoming more popular. Granted, Palo Alto does have a certain associated appeal, but there are many so many advantages to moving 7-10 miles up the Peninsula that they just cannot be ignored.
Which Bay Area location sparked your interest? Did you find any insight to the area where you already live? Leave your comments and questions below!
On November 7th our Silicon Valley office had the opportunity to volunteer with Sacred Heart.
Sacred Heart Community Service was created by Louise Benson, who began this whole operation from her garage in 1964. Louise started with two critical ideas. The first is that everyone shares a responsibility in working to overcome the injustice of poverty. The second is that sufficient resources exist within our community to make this happen.
“49 years later, these fundamental concepts of hard work, justice, and shared responsibility still frame the critical work of Sacred Heart Community Service. Sacred Heart's commitment to reach out and educate, engage, and involve the entire community in the services we provide sets it apart from other nonprofit organizations.”
Sacred Heart has a whole operation of give-back programs, from their food pantry to their clothing closet, after school children’s programs, ESL classes, and other opportunities for the disadvantaged.
Our office was split in two, half went to the pantry to sort food and create baskets, while the other half went to the closet to sort clothing and assist those in need.
Much of the food donated to Sacred Heart came from Second Harvest Food bank, while others were purchased from major grocery stores. The food is sorted into two baskets, a cook basket for those who have access to a kitchen, and a ready-to-eat basket for those who unfortunately do not. It was here that we learned the importance of pop top cans, and were told the story of a man who had received a can of soup, but with no can opener. He was found opening the can on an iron gate to get to the contents inside.
The clothes for the closet are donated at the back of their building, where we collected and sorted through each garment. We wanted to make sure the apparel is in good condition, and wanted to encourage dignity and self-respect. Each piece of donated clothing was examined for stains or holes to toss. We learned that Sacred Heart is always in need of men’s and baby’s clothing and accessories, and that the clothes collected here go straight to the needy, unlike at other charity services that sell the clothing for profit.
As a whole, we learned so much from this experience and would love the chance to come back and help again!
Article by Daniel Urbaniak, Practice Manager in Jobspring Silicon Valley.
For most people, interviewing is a daunting task. There's the gauntlet-style interview process, with interviewer after interviewer for hours on end. There's the never-ending phone screen-style, with a multitude of conversations over the phone that hopefully, if all goes well, lead to an on-site meeting. And once you finally land that face-to-face interview, you might find yourself being grilled by a panel of 5 to 10 interviewers all at once. Even if the interview process is streamlined, an initial 30-60 minute interview followed by an in-depth, in-person interview can still be a roller coaster ride of emotions.
Now, there are definitely methods to overcome the anxiety and properly prepare for success. The obvious is to stay true to yourself. Talk about what you know, and be honest when you are unsure of the answer. Every day I receive feedback from hiring managers who are looking to introduce new candidates to their team. Frequently, it goes something like, "I really like him or her, but I asked a question and they gave me the totally wrong answer. If they didn't know, they should have just said that instead of guessing and getting it completely wrong and continuing to justify that wrong answer."
If you are looking for less of an introspective approach to interviewing, there are a multitude of articles on the web detailing interview styles, prep questions, and how to deal with different scenarios, such as whiteboarding. There's an endless supply of information, really, however it is very easy to become inundated with information and styles to the point where themes begin to contradict one another.
You may want to consider using a recruiter, as they're often a wealth of knowledge when it comes to interviewing processes. The amount of time the recruiter has worked internally or with the client will dictate the amount of prep information that they're able to pass along. Obviously the recruiter you are working with wants you to be as successful as possible, but if this is a new client, they might not have a ton of insider information to pass along to you yet. At the same time, you could hit a similar wall with an internal recruiter or human resources, who are likely swamped with many responsibilities. Information falls through the cracks, or because you are 1 of 100 candidates interviewing, that internal resource just does not have the bandwidth to get the appropriate information to you.
Combinations of the aforementioned tools are helpful and will contribute to your success, if used properly. The job seekers that are the most successful are those that can put themselves in the shoes of the individual on the other side of the table.
With that in mind, I asked David Ta, Manager of Cloud Services at FireEye, to spend a few minutes with me discussing his thoughts when interviewing candidates for his team.
Me: If someone doesn’t have the ‘full package’ from a technical standpoint, what quality or intangible traits do you look for that would make up for those missing skills?
David: It’s pretty straight forward. I ask questions where they can work towards the answer. It shows me how they could work through problems. I am also looking for people that are intelligent, someone that inspires confidence when delivering their answer.
Obviously, this also depends on the role that I am filling. If we are talking about a task doer, I expect a certain level of passion or someone that really puts their heart and soul into their work as opposed to someone that is just cooling to collect a paycheck. If I know this person is interacting with others, if they are light technically it’s important they can articulate themselves in a way both technical and non-technical individuals can understand. Engineering teams will eat you alive if you don’t have the ability to explain your proposed solutions.
Me: What are the challenges and your thought process when you are considering head count and building a team?
David: Challenges, the main thing is finding that balance between a rockstar and a team player. Of course there are candidates that are great at what they do, but they know they are great and that can be a problem for culture. Team work is just as crucial as talent. If someone is less concerned with team work but succeeding on their own work it does not matter. If the one person is failing the team is failing. This is a mentality I consider when interviewing and follow through with once they are on the team. It’s also important to find individuals who take the initiative to do things that will help the team. That’s priceless really.
When actually considering the number of requirements a team needs, I consider the metrics. You cannot justify headcount without understanding and displaying statistics. You need actual numbers. I ‘ve been using a kanban board to visualize work across the team, and the resulting data will help me justify an actual headcount when needed.
Me: If money was no object what resources would you seek out to help you build your engineering team?
David: I would start hosting user groups and meetups here in our office. I would fly famous, relevant speakers (ie. Linux Torvalds) to attract as many people as we could. Obviously provide food, top shelf liquor, and soft drinks. Hopefully it would attract solid candidates and be a great marketing tool for our company. I think hosting free training sessions would also be a pretty cool way to identify talented individuals, you can build a relationship with them while they are in the office and if they excel at picking up new technology it would be an easy transition.
Me: What would your advice be for an entry level candidate?
David: I would tell them to go get their Red Hat (RHCE) certification. Then continue learning and advancing, eventually working toward a Red Hat Architect certification.
When it comes to salary, do not just spit out a number. Let the hiring manager talk to you about a number. Let’s say they are thinking 120K and all you want is 80K, you can really short change yourself.
Another thing to keep in mind while you are interviewing with any company is the interview is not just for the company, it’s for you too. Once you approach it that way you can be more confident.
Smile a lot and create rapport with your interviewer. I read a study that people that were interviewing were more likely to remember the name of a candidate that smiled more often than candidates who didn’t.
Me: What would be your advice for a mid-level engineer?
David: Specifically, I hire for automation. So learn how to script and code. Don’t just put on your resume that you do whatever it is you do, but actually explain what you did and how it either saved time and money or how it improved the business.
Me: What would be your advice for a senior- level engineer?
David: The more programming languages you know the better. Be sure to keep educating yourself on the newest technologies. Python and Ruby seem to be the languages in demand right now, back in the day it was Perl. People tend to just stick to what they know as they get older and it can be a huge detriment if they have not expanded their skillset.
Me: What was your most memorable response to an interview question?
David: There is definitely one… I was interviewing a Perl expert. So I asked him, “What is the difference between for loop and foreach loop?” He told me, “Four letters.” He followed up with the right answer, but very witty.
If you have a fear of interviewing or always wanted to know what that hiring manager was thinking, just put yourself in their shoes. What qualities would you look for in a candidate? David showed us it is not just about technical skills, but the whole package when building a team. There are qualities that each of us have, so take note, have confidence, and think about how you could add value to that team.
Article by Scott Purcell, Division Manager of Jobspring Silicon Valley
The question of how to start working in a new field (or in this case a technology) if you don’t have the necessary experience is one that plagues many job seekers. We all remember what it was like looking for that first job out of college. Everyone was interested, but you were missing the necessary experience for the role.
When technologists want to move into a new field, they run into the exact same problem. You have a great skill-set in one area, but you’re tired of that, and have decided you want to break into another area of expertise. Now companies won’t even give you the time of day. Your resume isn’t even considered! So what do you do? Here are a couple pointers that can help you transition into your desired career path.
One of the best ways to move into a new field is to get industry experience at your current job. If there’s a team specializing in that technology, offer to help outside of your normal work assignments. You can jump in and provide an additional resource to colleagues on these different teams. Because you’re a known entity and have relationships with these colleagues, they’ll be much more likely to feel comfortable having you help out on a project. Think of it like that entry-level internship you did during college to get your foot in the door with a company in hopes of being hired on after graduation. Once you've worked with this team, you might be able to pivot into joining them, but at the very least, you'll have that experience to add to your resume.
Unfortunately not all of us have the opportunity to help out a different team at our current jobs. So what’s the next best answer? Often, people are excited to show me their shiny new Certification. This alone is not the answer. Employers just don’t seem to care about them. Rather than spend your time and energy getting a certification, put it into actually learning the technology on your own or through a class. And most importantly, do something with what you learn. What do I mean? Well, jump on Github and put up some of your code, or develop your own website that displays your work, and put those things at the top of your resume. Potential employers love that! From this, they can actually see your work and see that you’re passionate about what you do. If you're a writer, just telling the publisher what you want to write is probably not going to get you very far. But if you show up with a polished short story, they're likely to take you much more seriously. Think of this as the side job you did in college that relates to the career you’re going after!
In recap, breaking into a new field is possible. What you should do is everything and anything to get experience in the area you want to pursue. Draw attention to yourself while you’re in the interview process, from the initial interaction with your resume, all the way to the in-person interviews and beyond.
Scott was recently quoted in Business Insider and Wired articles about the engineer salary increase in Silicon Valley, read what he had to say!
Article by Jason Cooper, Practice Manager for Jobspring Silicon Valley
I moved to San Jose in January of 2012 having spent the previous year and a half working in our Orange County office. My task: open up a brand new recruiting practice specialized in placing mobile engineers. I was excited to jump head first into a new emerging market, and take on the challenge. Working in the heart of technology and in a time where everyone seemingly owns a smart phone, I didn’t think there would be much of a problem carving out a place in this new frontier. What follows is a series of common themes I’ve encountered in my time here:
The Senior Candidate?
One of the first things I noticed was that the majority of companies are looking for senior engineers with plenty of experience building mobile applications. Of course everyone would love to hire someone with a wealth of experience in the domain. That line of thought makes a bit more sense to me with well-established technologies like PHP, Java, or C#. However, I thought to myself, what constitutes a senior mobile engineer? How can you ask for senior candidates, when the technology itself is so new? Everyone wants people with 2+ years of experience, but there simply aren’t enough of those people to go around. What I encountered were plenty of engineers who fall into the category of what I like to call the “weekend hobbyist.” These people have day jobs in software development, but not working in mobile full-time. They write an app here and there on their own to experiment with the technology and gain experience in the field. Many of these people struggle to find mobile jobs because companies want someone who has been doing it with a team in a production environment. The companies that hold out for the perfect candidate often spend a long time looking. The companies that are most successful in filling their positions are the ones that are open to hiring candidates with good computer science fundamentals, the right attitude, some relevant experience, and a hunger to transition their career into a full-fledged mobile role.
Native vs. HTML5 vs. Hybrid
Do you actually have a business need?
As a recruiter, you always want to work with clients that express some level of urgency in filling their position. I am happy to spend the time finding and recruiting candidates, scheduling interviews, getting feedback, etc. if the client is serious about filling their position. However, there are many hiring managers that seem to be “window shopping” when it comes to hiring mobile engineers. Why does this does happen? I suspect one of the primary reasons is because some companies simply don’t have much of an actual business need to hire mobile software engineers. There just isn’t a huge return on investment for them. If the company’s core product is a mobile application then sure there is a legitimate reason for them to invest in the technology. They stand to make money and attract users from it. However, many companies don’t stand to make a profit from their mobile applications. They are looking to build applications merely to have a presence, keep up with their competitors, and retain non-paying users like in the case of banks or insurance companies. Mobile is such a new space that many companies just don’t yet have the pressing need to hire quickly. On the flip side, hiring Java, Python, or Ruby engineers to work on scaling and adding new functionality to an existing product that generates revenue for the company creates a higher level of urgency to hire.
Salaries and perks in a competitive marketplace
It’s simple economics; when demand outweighs supply, the price goes up. For iOS and Android engineers that are active in their job search, it is not uncommon for them to generate several offers. With so much competition for talent, the salaries for mobile software engineers have steadily increased in the last year and a half. For those that wish to hire engineers with top 50 CS degrees, the price can be quite high. I have seen recent Stanford and Berkeley grads with mostly academic experience get offers north of $110K. I have seen companies going above and beyond to hire the best senior mobile engineers on the market. They may offer the ability to work from home, extra vacation days, free health benefits, cell phone plans, and sign on bonuses. Silicon Valley already boasts the highest salaries in the country and I anticipate they will continue to increase, as growth in the technology sector shows no signs of slowing down. For iOS and Android engineers in Silicon Valley these are the salary ranges (will depend on experience, education, etc.) one can expect if they were to test the market:
- Entry-Junior Level: $80,000-$110,000
- Mid Level: $110,000-$125,000
- Senior Level: $125,000-$160,000
- Architect - Hands on Manager: $160,000-$180,000
What do you think? Share your insight below!
On Thursday, March 14th, Tech In Motion Silicon Valley held a UX Meetup in our Jobspring Silicon Valley office. It was a great night, bringing the UX and tech community of Silicon Valley together with lots of networking and lively discussion.
We hosted guest speaker, Wendy Johansson. Wendy is the Sr. Director of User Experience at Tout, a video social networking start-up and considers herself to be a UX generalist.
Before joining Tout, she was the User Experience Manager at Oolaya. When she joined Oolaya at just 20 employees, she grew UX not only to be a team, but a user-centered design strategy for the company when she left at 350 people. She spoke to our crowd about "Making UX Matter to Your Company" and her thoughts on making UX a strategy within your company and not just a deliverable.
The energy in the crowd was infectious! UX professionals and tech enthusiasts came together and everyone seemed to agree that UX should matter to any company. The presentation became more of a discussion amongst the audience and Wendy, which was great!
We were able to ask Wendy a few questions about User Experience after the event. Check out what she had to say!
JS: A lot of Silicon Valley companies are building out in house design teams from scratch. I know that you were the first designer at Ooyala and helped build that team out. What is some advice you can give these companies when building out a team from the ground up?
WJ: Don't just hire a bunch of UX folks and expect great UX to be the result! You need to have every team in the company understand what value UX will bring to the success of your product and be inviting and inquisitive in integrating UX into the company. Without everyone on board, you'll have a frustrated UX team that focuses more energy on fighting for their voice to be heard, instead of fighting for the user's voice to be heard. Second key is to stop seeking a unicorn - you want a UX designer that also front end codes? That's like asking your hairdresser to also design your wardrobe because they both concern outward appearance. It's not the same thing!
JS: When and how should companies incorporate UX researchers into their team?
WJ: At Ooyala, we didn't have a dedicated UX research team until we were ready to start building brand new products based on discovery and exploration of the industry. So we hired a really smart UX researcher to join the team and she started working directly with the Account Management team to set up a Customer Database to define what customers we talk to and when. This really helped us as a Product team to build trust with customers by not overloading them with research requests, and by ensuring we work with the same customers through the life-cycle of a product (from exploration to beta to release).
JS: How have you seen UX design evolve in the last 5 years?
WJ: The definition of "UX" varies wildly among different sized companies, different regions, different teams. However, I'm seeing UX becoming more of a "catch-all" term that incorporates user research, usability, information architecture, interaction design and visual design. So to a lot of people, UX is a generalist who can do all of those things.
JS: What are some qualities you feel are essential to have to be a great UX leader?
WJ: A great UX leader needs to be able to take a step back and see the bigger picture - not just the business case for a product, but the business case of the company. Not just the best user experience for a given product, but the best user experience that will scale as the product evolves. And a great UX leader sees the people.
JS: What do you do to motivate your team and foster creativity?
WJ: I think of my team as people, not as designers. People need to be challenged, need to have room to breathe and do what they're passionate about, and need to have work/life balance. So I'm incredibly concerned about how my team members are feeling as people and like to have very open communication with them about what's exciting or demotivating them. I also want each team member to feel accountable and proud of the quality of the user experience they're creating, so I enjoy "show and tell" of work to other designers (or the entire company!). This gets feedback from your peers and colleagues that you respect and pushes you to always do your best.
By: Scott Purcell, Division Manager of Jobspring Silicon Valley
Anyone who has lived in Silicon Valley for a while and works in the high tech world, particularly in software, can attest to a market where the competition for solid talent has continued to grow more competitive by the year. As a high tech recruiter managing an office focused on placing software engineers I have seen both the competition for talent grow as well as that very same competition drive salaries into a realm that we have never seen before.
To be fair, salaries for software engineers in Silicon Valley have always been, on average, probably the highest in the United States. I personally came up from LA in March of 2007 and noticed right away the differences in salary ranges in Silicon Valley. For example, very top tier software engineers or architects in Los Angeles would on average be making somewhere in the 110k-125k range give or take. Entry-level grads with a BS in CS from top Universities like UCLA would start out making 50k-70k. These numbers all sounded pretty reasonable to me when you take into account averages for other professions and cost of living. Coming to Silicon Valley definitely was eye opening. Recent grads were getting 70k-80k. Senior Engineers were on average getting anywhere from 120k-140k. These average numbers really blew me away.
Fast forward to 2010. We’ve just come out of a pretty nasty recession and the rest of the country is still hurting economically. Silicon Valley however is on the rebound. After a few years of radio silence in the venture capital world the money is flowing again. Software engineers that have put in a solid 3-5 years with their current companies and have waited out the recession are beginning to sense that there’s a new boom on the rise. Companies begin to use those funds to hire top talent. At first, salaries seem to stay the same on average. But as 2011 begins trends start to emerge. Facebook and Google begin competing fiercely for the very best young software talent and willing to pay 100k+ for entry-level software engineers. Other companies like Yahoo follow suite forcing venture-funded start-ups to also raise their salaries. Those engineers that had been making 125k-140k are looking for new jobs and, with the demand for their skills, are not willing to consider lateral moves. This drives the salaries up and now 150k base salaries for Senior Software Engineers has become the average. New trends in the market like Big Data and HTML5 drive the salaries up even more.
For the first time since I’ve been recruiting I’m placing Senior Engineers at base salaries of 165k. You would think that these would be big, profitable companies, but the companies paying those salaries range from Series A funded startups to 300 person profitable startups. Gone are the days of paying someone a lower salary with the promise of equity unless that equity is something extremely unique; as in 1% of the company and you can still expect a relatively competitive base salary.
Today, in 2013, the salaries in Silicon Valley are drastically different then even six years ago when I moved to Silicon Valley. This year alone I’ve placed entry-level grads starting at 80k and generated an offer for a Java Hadoop candidate with only three years of experience at 175k. Salaries for Senior Java Engineers that my team is placing range from 140k on the very low end to 165k. Candidates with 3-5 years of experience are easily being offered 110k-130k base salaries with significant equity and / or bonuses. This presents challenges to many companies from both a budgeting and internal equity standpoint but that’s Silicon Valley!
So what will future salaries look like in 2013?
This is an intriguing question. We’ve come to a really interesting place regarding compensation in Silicon Valley. Right now top engineering talent is getting 165k and above. With some C-Level executives and lower-management in the same range it can make things challenging from an internal-equity standpoint. Do companies stick to their guns and lose out on candidates or do they look to adjust their entire structure?
My personal opinion is that there are going to be some serious growing pains in 2013 and it will take until Q3 or Q4 until some companies begin to catch up to the market. Many companies will think that salaries are inflated and not want to pay the top salaries when those candidates may not be as skilled as the engineers already at the company. They also won’t want to up the salaries of the current employees. However, as word gets about what the market is paying and there are more companies paying those salary ranges we will start see more candidates making moves based partly on salary. Some companies will successfully counteroffer those candidates and others may lose talent.
By the end of the year most companies will be paying that market rate for top talent and will have to adjust their internal salary structure. This all hinges on the continued economic growth that we have seen the past couple years. Fingers crossed!
If my predictions are right, the good news is there will be some exciting growth in the tech world and more than enough money to go around for both talent and budding companies to continue the explosive innovation that makes Silicon Valley the high tech mecca of the world! As the war for talent continues I’m excited and interested to see how this will continue to evolve the high tech market in Silicon Valley and the impact it has on other tech meccas across the nation.
As you may have read, Jobspring Silicon Valley got to welcome Daniel Urbaniak from Jobspring Philadelphia to their growing team at the start of the New Year! Dan was promoted to Practice Manager to open up a brand new team at Jobspring Silicon Valley specializing in placing DevOps, Python, and Linux System Administrator engineers.
Dan was born and raised in New Jersey and joined the Jobspring Philadelphia team shortly after graduating from Rowan University. This is his first time on the West Coast and he is quickly getting settled in Silicon Valley! He has not only been busy finding a place to live and getting to know the area but has been very focused on building strong relationships with clients and job seekers in Silicon Valley.
We're so happy to have him on our Silicon Valley team!
If you're looking for a DevOps, Python or Linux Sys Admin position or just want to welcome Dan to Silicon Valley, give him a call!
How to Contact Dan:
Phone: (408) 418-1520